The Titles of Nobility Clauses (Art. I §9 Cl. 8 & §10 Cl. 1) forbid government from granting titles of nobility, meaning no creation or enforcement of enduring superior/inferior legal classes by fiat (hereditary or otherwise).
If TON were seriously applied, it would not just threaten a few programs, it would make many federal departments structurally suspect because they create, maintain, or enforce legal hierarchies (privileged access, inferior status, enduring disabilities/privileges) that look a lot like modern nobility/serfdom.
Below is the list of major Cabinet-level departments (plus a few key independent agencies), whether TON could plausibly touch them, current political rationales for keeping/dismantling them, and how TON would rewrite the argument.
Cabinet-Level Departments
| Department | TON Touch? (Plausible Hierarchy) | Current Rationale (Left / Right / Bipartisan) | TON Rewrite of the Argument |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture (USDA) | Moderate – Farm subsidies, crop insurance tiers, rural development grants create privileged classes of producers | Right: Cut corporate welfare. Left: Protect family farms. Bipartisan: Food security. | TON: Government-created superior class (subsidized mega-farms) vs. inferior (unsubsidized smallholders). |
| Commerce | High – Patent/trademark monopolies, export licenses, spectrum allocation create enduring privileged access | Right: Shrink bureaucracy. Left: Protect innovation/trade. | TON: Government-granted exclusive rights = nobility-like monopolies. |
| Defense (DoD) | High – Security clearances, contractor preferences, base access create superior legal classes | Bipartisan: National security. Right: Cut waste. Left: Reduce militarism. | TON: Clearances = nobility access. Base privileges = enduring superior status. |
| Education (ED) | Moderate – Funding formulas, accreditation, Title IX enforcement create privileged/compliant vs. non-compliant tiers | Right: Eliminate federal overreach. Left: Protect civil rights/equity. | TON: Government-created superior (funded/compliant) vs. inferior (defunded/non-compliant) institutions. |
| Energy | Moderate – Licensing (nuclear, pipelines), subsidies, grid access create privileged producers | Right: Cut green subsidies. Left: Promote renewables. | TON: Government-granted exclusive energy-market access = nobility-like privilege. |
| Health & Human Services (HHS) | High – Licensing (medicare providers), research grants, vaccine mandates create superior/inferior classes | Bipartisan: Public health. Right: Reduce mandates. Left: Expand access. | TON: Government-created superior (licensed/approved) vs. inferior (non-compliant) providers/patients. |
| Homeland Security (DHS) | Very High – Watchlists, no-fly, PreCheck, immigration tiers are textbook superior/inferior classes | Bipartisan: Security. Right: Border control. Left: Reduce overreach. | TON: Watchlists/PreCheck = nobility/serfdom mobility classes. Immigration tiers = enduring inferior status. |
| Housing & Urban Development | Moderate – Public housing priority, zoning grants create privileged access tiers | Left: Housing justice. Right: Reduce federal role. | TON: Government-created superior (priority access) vs. inferior (waitlisted/excluded) housing classes. |
| Interior | Moderate – Land-use permits, grazing rights, tribal recognition create privileged land access | Right: Reduce regulation. Left: Protect environment/tribes. | TON: Government-granted exclusive land/resource privileges = nobility-like. |
| Justice (DOJ) | High – Prosecutorial discretion, plea-bargaining tiers, civil-rights enforcement create superior/inferior classes | Bipartisan: Rule of law. Right: Law & order. Left: Civil rights. | TON: Prosecutorial immunity/plea tiers = superior legal class. Civil-rights enforcement = government privilege. |
| Labor (DOL) | Very High – Registered apprenticeships, prevailing wage, union certification create privileged access | Right: Cut regulation. Left: Protect workers. | TON: Apprenticeships/union certification = modern guild charters (state-granted privileged access to work). |
| State | Moderate – Passport privileges, diplomatic immunity create superior mobility/legal classes | Bipartisan: Diplomacy. | TON: Diplomatic immunity = literal nobility privilege. Passport tiers = mobility nobility. |
| Transportation (DOT) | Moderate – Airline route/slot allocation, infrastructure grants create privileged access | Bipartisan: Infrastructure. Right: Reduce regulation. | TON: Slot allocation = government-granted superior access to public resource (airspace). |
| Treasury | Moderate – Tax-exempt status, financial licensing create privileged classes | Bipartisan: Revenue. Right: Cut spending. | TON: Tax exemptions/licensing = enduring government-granted superiority. |
| Veterans Affairs (VA) | Moderate – Priority healthcare, disability ratings create privileged access tiers | Bipartisan: Honor veterans. | TON: Priority ratings = government-created superior class for benefits. |
Independent Agencies / Other Entities Often Mentioned
- EPA: Moderate TON touch (permits, enforcement tiers create privileged vs. non-compliant). Right wants to cut.
- FBI / NSA / CIA (under Justice / independent): Very high TON touch (clearances, surveillance tiers). Almost untouchable politically.
- FCC: Moderate (spectrum allocation, broadcast licenses = government-granted monopolies).
- SEC: Moderate (broker/dealer licensing, insider-trading rules create privileged market access).
- Social Security Administration: Low-moderate (benefit tiers create superior/inferior classes). Untouchable politically.
DEI & Civil-Rights Lanes – What Else Is Endangered?
Civil-rights movements (Brown v. Board, Civil Rights Act 1964, Voting Rights Act 1965) succeeded without TON using Equal Protection, Due Process, and statutory enforcement. TON was never needed because the 14th Amendment forbids state-created racial castes.
But if TON were applied broadly:
Endangered
- DEI programs in federal agencies/universities/contractors: If they create enduring superior access (hiring/promotion preferences) or inferior status (exclusion for non-DEI-compliant), TON could hit them as government-created privilege hierarchies.
- Affirmative action remnants (post-2023 SCOTUS ruling): Already weakened, but TON could finish them off if framed as government nobility.
- Civil-rights enforcement offices (EEOC, OCR in ED, DOJ Civil Rights Division): If they designate “superior” (compliant) vs. “inferior” (non-compliant) entities with legal consequences, TON could challenge the hierarchy itself.
Not endangered
- Core anti-discrimination protections (Title VII, ADA, Fair Housing Act) are statutory, not constitutional hierarchies; they prohibit private discrimination without creating government nobility.
- Voting rights (15th, 19th, 24th, 26th Amendments) are direct constitutional expansions of equality, no TON conflict.
- Brown v. Board logic (equal protection) survives intact.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Summary
- Ends government-created mobility nobility (PreCheck, clearances)
- Ends guild-like apprenticeship/licensing monopolies
- Ends retaliatory status downgrades (Cleland-style cases)
- Restores structural republican limit on hierarchy-by-fiat
- Disrupts national security (watchlists, clearances)
- Disrupts workforce training (registered apprenticeships)
- Disrupts civil-rights enforcement if framed as creating compliance hierarchies
- Massive legal/political chaos if broad ruling
- No clear transition plan, Congress would have to scramble
- Public backlash (“you just made airports unsafe / ended worker protections”)
TON is a nuke, not a scalpel. A win would be exciting for liberty in the structural sense but initially terrifying for anyone who relies on the current hierarchies (security, labor standards, civil-rights enforcement).
It’s why nobody touches it. But the text is still there, waiting. 🔥🗽
Leave a Reply